Continuous subcutaneous foslevodopa/foscarbidopa infusion (LDp/CDp-CSI) is an effective treatment for patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), but infusion-site nodules are a major cause of treatment discontinuation. Systemic inflammation can influence local skin tolerance; however, predictive biomarkers remain unidentified. To evaluate the predictive value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for clinically significant infusion-site nodules (PD-CSN) during LDp/CDp-CSI and to establish a clinical management framework to mitigate their development. We prospectively followed 38 patients with PD initiating LDp/CDp-CSI for ≥ 3 months. Baseline immunological data were collected before infusion. A subset of 30 patients was followed for an average of 11 months to identify factors associated with skin nodules at longer follow-up. Nodules were classified by blinded raters. Between-group comparisons, ANCOVA, ROC curve, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed. At 3 months, 42% of patients were PD-CSN and showed higher baseline neutrophil counts ( P = 0.030) and NLR ( P = 0.007), with NLR remaining independently associated with nodule status (F = 7.06, P = 0.012). ROC analysis demonstrated acceptable discrimination (AUC = 0.73, P = 0.016). At last follow-up, lower baseline lymphocyte counts ( P = 0.002) and higher NLR ( P = 0.001) were observed in PD-CSN. High baseline NLR predicted earlier nodule onset ( P = 0.001). Despite frequent nodules, multidisciplinary team surveillance, including remote and in-person follow-up, limited treatment discontinuation to 5.3%. Baseline systemic inflammation, reflected by NLR, predicts both the onset and persistence of infusion-site nodules during LDp/CDp-CSI. NLR may serve as a clinically accessible biomarker for early risk stratification. Multidisciplinary surveillance facilitates timely nodule management and enhances treatment adherence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Contaldi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: