Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Climate action is shifting copper production from primary copper smelting (PCU) toward secondary copper smelting (SCU_RF), an important source of unintentional persistent organic pollutants (UPOPs). However, climate-driven changes in UPOP emissions across the copper industry remain poorly understood. Here, emissions of six Stockholm Convention-listed UPOPs from global and regional copper-smelting subsectors during 2023-2050 are estimated under different climate scenarios. Toxic equivalent (TEQ)-based emissions are used to compare relative toxic potency, while mass emissions are also quantified to reflect non-TEQ-based management relevance. By 2050, global UPOP emissions under a net-zero pathway are projected to be 10%-31% higher than under the current-policy pathway. The TEQ emissions of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), together with mass emissions of hexachlorobenzene (HCB) and pentachlorobenzene (PeCBz), warrant attention. SCU_RF is projected to contribute 62%-98% of total TEQ emissions across UPOPs, making it the priority control source, while mass emissions of HCB and PeCBz from PCU and direct melting of high-quality scrap should receive attention. Climate-action-driven TEQ emission increases are concentrated in East Asia and the Pacific and in Europe and Central Asia. These findings reveal a pollution trade-off in copper decarbonization and highlight the need for targeted control strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: