Rock surface luminescence dating has developed into a promising approach to constrain depositional ages of clasts. The prerequisites for its successful application are the precise determination of the clast-specific dosimetry and the sufficient pre-burial resetting of the luminescence signal into a certain depth beneath the clast-surface. Dosimetry of clasts is significantly influenced by the internal beta dose rate, which largely depends on grain-size range and internal potassium content of feldspar within rock slices. In the current study, six clasts are investigated from three distinct fluvial terraces of the Bruche River in north-eastern France. Previously published independent age control from sandy deposits of the terraces indicate depositional ages of ~12–14 ka for the youngest, ~27–35 ka for the middle, and a minimum age of ~200 ka for the oldest terrace. Clast-based multi-elevated-temperature post-IR infrared stimulated luminescence (pIR) ages show systematic deviations from age control, overestimating by ~50-150% for the youngest terrace, ~10-30% for the middle terrace, but confirming the minimum age for the oldest terrace. The present study provides methodological advancements by estimating grain-size range and K-content in feldspar grains within rock slices using µ-X-ray fluorescence and microprobe analysis, respectively. Modern clasts from the present riverbed indicate that high-temperature pIR signals retain significant residual ages in rock slices, ranging from ~2-3 ka for pIR110 over ~5-6 ka for pIR170 to ~8 ka for pIR225 signals, while IR50 residual ages remain negligible (<1 ka). This study also demonstrates the potential for using fully saturated rock slices from clast interiors to perform reliable fading correction. As the clast-based luminescence ages overestimate the corresponding ages derived from sandy deposits, this highlights the remaining limitations that must be considered for this approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marik et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: