Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The study of sound in the environment or soundscapes has evolved from artistic appreciation into a robust scientific discipline, leading to the establishment of three interconnected fields: namely acoustic ecology, soundscape ecology, and ecoacoustics. This study provides a historical review and comprehensive bibliometric analysis of these three fields, focusing on their evolution, thematic overlaps, and distinct methodologies. Using the Scopus database, we analyzed 928 of peer-reviewed publications ranging from the early, human-centric roots of acoustic ecology to the more modern, technology-driven ecoacoustic monitoring. Our bibliometric mapping highlights the growth in research over the last two decades, identifying key authors, influential institutions, and emerging clusters—specifically, the transition from various human-based acoustics and soundscape studies to biodiversity assessment using biophony. While acoustic ecology initially focused on human-perceived environments, this analysis demonstrates how soundscape ecology and ecoacoustics have broadened the scope to ecological processes across various scales. The findings reveal a convergent trajectory where these fields increasingly integrate to assess ecological health, land-use changes, and biodiversity. This review provides a timely, structured overview of this evolving landscape, offering a vital reference for researchers and practitioners in landscape ecology, environmental management, soundscape, and sustainable development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: