Why the study?
Current medical therapies for Marfan syndrome slow disease progression but do not prevent major complications, underscoring the need for new treatment strategies and unbiased discovery approaches.
Do standard Marfan syndrome therapies, targeted TGF-β signaling modulators, or compounds from a 1,500-drug library reduce nppb-driven cardiac stress and rescue cardiovascular defects in a fbn3-/- zebrafish model of Marfan syndrome?
Do standard Marfan syndrome therapies, targeted TGF-β signaling modulators, or compounds from a 1,500-drug library reduce nppb-driven cardiac stress and rescue cardiovascular defects in a fbn3-/- zebrafish model of Marfan syndrome?
This preclinical study establishes a highly sensitive secreted nanoluciferase zebrafish reporter for quantifying cardiac stress in Marfan syndrome, demonstrating that neither current standard-of-care drugs nor over 1,500 screened compounds reproducibly rescue the fbn3-/- cardiovascular phenotype.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Null screening results in this zebrafish Marfan model should not alter clinical practice; leaves open the platform's utility for identifying translatable therapies.
Background Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a life-threatening heritable connective tissue disorder caused by pathogenic variants in fibrillin-1, characterized by progressive cardiovascular disease. Current medical therapies slow disease progression but do not prevent major complications, underscoring the need for new treatment strategies and unbiased discovery approaches. Methods We used a zebrafish model of MFS lacking fibrillin-3 ( fbn3 -/- ), which recapitulates key cardiovascular phenotypes including cardiac stress, valvular defects, arrhythmia, and aortic dilation. To enable sensitive, quantitative assessment of cardiac stress, we generated a novel transgenic zebrafish reporter expressing secreted nanoluciferase under control of the stress-responsive nppb promoter. This reporter was combined with morphological phenotyping and bulbus arteriosus (BA) imaging. We evaluated standard MFS therapies, targeted modulators of TGF-β signaling, and performed an unbiased high-throughput drug screen of over 1 500 clinically approved compounds across multiple developmental treatment windows. Results fbn3 -/- larvae exhibited markedly elevated nppb activity that correlated with phenotypic severity and peaked during stages of highest mortality. The nanoluciferase reporter provided a ∼1 000-fold dynamic range, substantially outperforming Firefly luciferase-based assays. Pharmacological inhibition of TGF-β signaling produced transient or deleterious effects, while β-blockers, losartan, and allopurinol failed to consistently improve cardiac stress, pericardial edema, or BA dilation. The unbiased high-throughput drug screen identified a small number of primary and secondary hits; however, none demonstrated reproducible phenotypic rescue upon rigorous multi-dose, multi-time window validation. Conclusions This study establishes a sensitive zebrafish-based platform for early, quantitative assessment of cardiovascular stress in MFS. Our findings highlight the limited efficacy of current therapies, the context-dependent nature of TGF-β modulation, and the biological complexity underlying MFS pathogenesis. Although no definitive therapeutic candidates were identified, this work lays a robust foundation for expanded unbiased discovery efforts aimed at identifying disease-modifying interventions for MFS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horvat et al. (2026) studied Marfan syndrome. Standard Marfan syndrome therapies (beta-blockers, losartan, allopurinol), TGF-beta signaling inhibitors (refametinib, RepSox), and >1,500 clinically approved compounds vs. Solvent-treated (DMSO) or untreated fbn3-/- mutant zebrafish embryos was evaluated on Cardiac stress (nppb promoter-driven secreted nanoluciferase luminescence), pericardial edema severity, and bulbus arteriosus dilation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: