Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We determine exactly how well a measure-and-prepare ("measure-first") forger can copy qudit phase states. For one input copy and every number m of output copies, in every dimension d, we prove that the flat seed is the optimal measure-first strategy for the continuous family of phase states, the optimum being the top eigenvalue of an explicit matrix on the symmetric subspace (for example (7d − 8 + √(25d² − 64d + 48))/(2d³) at 1→2). The proof reduces the question to a negative-correlation inequality for closed lattice walks in symmetric time-dependent windows, which we prove by summation by parts; this combinatorial core is verified in the Lean 4 proof assistant. Consequently, for cyclic phase-state codebooks ψ_x = d^(−1/2) Σ_j ω^(x·k_j) |j⟩, the states used in quantum fingerprinting and quantum hashing, in every dimension and every 1→m task the measure-first optimum equals the continuous one if and only if the keys form a Bₘ₊₁ set, whereas at 1→2 the coherent optimum does if and only if they form a Sidon set. Around this law we compare, for every copying task T→T+k, the optimal coherent copier (any quantum channel) and the optimal measure-first copier on a finite codebook with the continuous family: both finite-codebook optima are at least the continuous ones; if the keys have no additive collisions among multisets of size 2T+k, both are equal for every dimension; and for codebooks that are collision-free at size T, every collision at size 2T+k strictly increases the value of the natural measure-first strategy. For cyclic qubit codebooks of q states and every 1→m task (m ≥ 2) we prove an exact leak-order theorem: the measure-first optimum equals the continuous one if and only if q ≥ m+2, while the coherent optimum already equals it when q ≥ m+1, so q = m+1 separates the two attackers for every m. Pre-registered experiments on IBM superconducting processors, in which the strategies are emulated by classically recombining two circuit stages, confirm the predicted qubit gaps at 1→2 and 1→3. We give an explicit polynomial-phase hash with a guaranteed (sufficient) copy budget and prove a separation for it. Whether measure-first attackers leak no later than coherent ones for every codebook remains open; the stronger statement that the measure-first gap always exceeds the coherent gap is false for general finite phase codebooks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
M. Weldon (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: