Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Unemployment and limited access to decent job opportunities disproportionately affect vulnerable individuals. In Italy, policies designed to promote the participation of the disadvantaged labour force grant Work Integration Social Cooperatives (WISCs) tax benefits and contribution revenues. In return, WISCs employing disadvantaged individuals generate public finance savings by lowering publicly funded health care and social assistance expenditures, while creating value added through increased VAT revenues. This paper investigates the net balance for public finances of such labour policies. We employ a monetary cost–benefit analysis of 6892 job placements facilitated by social cooperatives in Lombardy, Emilia‐Romagna and Veneto. We use VALORIS, an evaluation approach that assesses the financial sustainability of every single job placement of disadvantaged workers, and apply it to 92 WISCs followed between 2014 and 2023. Our results indicate that the Italian active labour policy of work integration of disadvantaged workers in social cooperatives is self‐financing. Moreover, we find heterogeneity in the costs and benefits associated with different types of disadvantages. Finally, we highlight the relevance of the job placement of workers who are signalled as vulnerable by social services, but who do not receive incentives for their hiring, in producing positive effects on the public budget.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiaf et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: