Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Symbiotic ectomycorrhizal fungi (EMF) are central to oak tree nutrition and stress tolerance, contributing to nutrient acquisition in exchange for host-derived photosynthates. Trees increasingly experience interacting abiotic and biotic stress events, such as drought and pest or pathogen attack, which may reduce C reserves, disrupt physiological functioning, and contribute to a progressive decline in tree vitality and resilience. We studied the effects of severe drought, simulated by installing rain exclusion shelters, and reduced host C allocation associated with pathogen attack, simulated by partial ringbarking, on soil fungal communities associated with semi-mature oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.). EMF communities were more strongly affected by 20 months of simulated drought than by partial ringbarking. Drought reduced EMF species richness and altered community composition with increased relative presence of saprotrophic fungi compared with untreated controls. These changes were likely associated with a combination of low soil moisture and drought-induced changes in soil nutrient dynamics, including increased inorganic nitrogen availability. Partial ringbarking did not affect overall community richness compared to the control, although specific nutrient stress indicator species, such as Cortinarius sp., were associated with the treatment. These patterns suggest that reduced belowground carbon allocation and impaired root function under ringbarking may have altered host nutrient demand. This may have favoured the maintenance of nutrient-acquisitive ectomycorrhizal symbionts despite their relatively high carbon requirements. Understanding how EMF communities respond to prolonged environmental stress will be increasingly important for predicting woodland resilience and the progression of oak decline under climate change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Corbett et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: