Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study evaluates fixed-tilt reflector-assisted floating photovoltaic (FPV) and land-based photovoltaic (LPV) systems at Kremasta Lake, Greece, through a coupled analysis of irradiance, shading, thermal response, PV-module and reflector degradation, technical lifetime, maintenance, and economics. For a reflector tilt of 10 ∘ , the maximum first-year energy yield occurs at a PV tilt of 43 ∘ and an initial reflector reflectivity of ρ 0 = 0.95 , providing annual energy gains of 18.41% for FPV and 17.86% for LPV relative to their respective optimal reflector-free configurations. Reflector-enhanced irradiance increases module temperature, with a maximum hourly temperature-induced efficiency penalty of 3.84% for the 10 ∘ reflector configuration. The maximum annual PV degradation rate increases from 0.89% to 1.26% yr –1 for FPV and from 1.17% to 2.45% yr –1 for LPV under the most severe reflector-assisted conditions. Consequently, at the first-year energy-optimal configurations, the modelled PV technical lifetime decreases from 26.03 to 18.57 years for FPV and from 19.97 to 9.98 years for LPV. When material-dependent reflector ageing, cleaning, replacement, and technology-specific O&M costs are included over a 20-year project horizon, the economic optimum shifts to ρ 0 = 0.75 . The minimum FPV LCOE decreases from 46.59 to 45.90 EUR/MWh, whereas the corresponding LPV LCOE increases from 46.50 to 47.49 EUR/MWh. These results demonstrate that the reflector configuration maximizing first-year energy is not the configuration minimizing lifetime electricity cost, and that reflector integration is economically more compatible with FPV than with LPV under the investigated conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polychronakis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: