Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study aims to analyze the effect of work stress, social support in the workplace, and work-life balance on employee performance at the Central Statistics Agency (BPS) of Magelang Regency. This research employs a quantitative approach using a survey method and a census (saturated sampling) technique. Data were collected through questionnaires distributed to 50 employees of BPS Magelang Regency. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 26, which was utilized for validity tests, reliability tests, classical assumption tests, Z tests, multiple linear regression analysis, t-tests, F-tests, and the coefficient of determination. The results show that work stress has no significant effect on employee performance (tvalue = 0.928; sig. = 0.358). Social support has a positive and significant effect on employee performance (tvalue = 2.799; sig. = 0.007). Work-life balance has an influence on employee performance, though not a significant one (tvalue = 1.937; sig. = 0.059). Simultaneously, work stress, social support, and work-life balance have a significant effect on employee performance (Fvalue = 6.605; sig. = 0.001) with a coefficient of determination (R2) value of 0.243, indicating that the independent variables contribute 24.3% to employee performance. The findings indicate that social support in the wo rkplace is the most dominant factor influencing employee performance in public sector institutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fauziyyah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: