Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The integration of AI tools like ChatGPT in language education presents both opportunities and challenges. This mixed-methods study examined the impact of AI on composing strategies and writing performance among 87 upper-intermediate Iranian EFL learners, randomly assigned to a traditional group (n=43) and an AI group (n=44). Both groups completed IELTS Writing Task 2 as pre- and post-tests; the AI group used ChatGPT during the post-test. Concurrent think-aloud protocols, supported by training and video demonstrations, were used to analyze writing strategies, while reflective journals provided qualitative insights. Results showed the AI group achieved significantly higher post-test scores but employed fewer cognitive, rhetorical, metacognitive, communicative, and socio-affective writing strategies, indicating reduced strategic engagement. Thematic analysis revealed learners’ ambivalence: they valued AI for efficiency and personalized feedback but expressed concerns about authenticity, creativity, equity, and academic integrity. The findings suggest that while AI can enhance writing performance, over-reliance may hinder critical skill development. The study advocates for critical AI literacy, emphasizing scaffolded, ethical AI integration aligned with Vygotskian principles. Educators should prioritize personal voice, originality, and higher-order thinking to ensure AI supports, rather than substitutes, the writing process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rasoul Mohammad Hosseinpur (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: