Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Iron (Fe) is an essential micronutrient for rice and a key modifier of soil chemical processes in paddy fields. Although Fe-based amendments have been used to improve soil fertility and crop performance, most studies have focused on short-term responses or repeated applications, leaving the long-term agronomic effect of a single Fe input under field conditions poorly understood. Here, with a seven-year field experiment at two paddy sites in Tokamachi and Nagaoka, Niigata, Japan, we examined whether a one-time application of zero-valent Fe powder could produce persistent agronomic benefits over multiple cropping seasons. Linear mixed-effects models showed that, at both sites, soil free iron oxide remained persistently higher through the seventh year after application, while rice panicle number exhibited a significant positive overall response to Fe amendment across the seven-year period (+33.0 m⁻² at Tokamachi and +11.4 m⁻² at Nagaoka). However, its conversion into grain yield differed between sites. At Tokamachi, increased panicle number was maintained as higher total grain number (+3084 m⁻²) and grain yield (+0.482 t ha⁻¹), whereas at Nagaoka, it was offset by fewer grains per panicle (−5.1 grains panicle⁻¹), resulting in no significant yield increase. To further explore the nutrient-related clues underlying the common panicle-number enhancement, we analyzed plant N and Fe uptake. Interestingly, structural equation models showed that the panicle-number response was more closely associated with enhanced N acquisition and its coordination with Fe uptake than with Fe uptake alone. Our findings indicate that Fe-based management can have long-lasting effects on rice yield formation, while highlighting the need to understand site-specific constraints on yield realization. Given that yield-component compensation was substantially weaker at Tokamachi, where background soil Fe was lower, future work should examine whether the yield benefit of Fe amendment depends on background soil Fe status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: