Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
I said the spin set at our universe's birth scar should cascade through every scale, and that it would line up somewhere. The scar has a published address: the axis the cosmic microwave background's largest patterns line up on. So the test is simple. Count spiral galaxies by handedness on the two sides of that axis and see if the count lines up. The test was written down and sealed before the catalogue was opened: one axis, one statistic, one bar. I counted 77,840 galaxies with a published spin direction in an author-posted Sloan Digital Sky Survey catalogue. In the hemisphere the axis points into, clockwise galaxies lead by 1.23 percent. In the opposite hemisphere, counterclockwise galaxies lead by 0.36 percent. The signs face the way the claim says they should. The size does not clear the bar. The difference between the hemispheres stands at 2.10 times its own error, and the sealed bar was 3.00. A difference of 2.27 points would have passed. The count saw 1.59 points. So the survey form of my claim dies here, at this survey's size, and this paper prints the kill at the same size a stand would have got. What dies is the claim as a survey claim on 77,840 galaxies. The birth claim itself is not spent either way. It never rode on one catalogue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: