Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Improvements to water quality, sanitation, handwashing (WASH) and nutrition may prevent enteric pathogen infection during the first two years of life. Few randomised controlled trials have measured pathogen-specific effects of WASH and nutritional interventions. Methods: Within a 2x2 factorial cluster-randomized trial of WASH and nutritional interventions in Bangladesh, we tested dried blood spot specimens with multiplex assay for IgG responses to 12 enteric pathogens: Norovirus, Campylobacter, LT-producing enterotoxigenic E. coli (LT-ETEC), Shigella, non-typhoidal and typhoidal Salmonella enterica, Vibrio cholerae, Cryptosporidium, Giardia, Entamoeba histolytica, Taenia solium, and Strongyloides stercoralis. Primary analysis included children with IgG measurements at ~24 months, and secondary analysis assessed early effects in a sub-study at ~14 months. We estimated age-specific seroprevalence and marginal seroprevalence differences for WASH and nutrition effects. Trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01590095 ). Findings: Across the four arms (450 clusters), 4817 samples were tested for IgG responses, 2453 samples at the primary endpoint. Seroprevalence increased with age, consistent with intense early-life transmission. For highest transmission pathogens, >94% of children had seroconverted to norovirus, LT-ETEC and Campylobacter by 12-18 months. WASH effects were modest and pathogen-specific but generally protective. At 24 months, children that received WASH interventions had less antibody against Shigella (-4.5%, 95% CI -7.6% to -1.5%), non-typhoidal S. enterica (-4.0%, 95% CI -6.5% to -1.5%), and Giardia (-3.4%, 95% CI -6.7% to -0.2%), although not after multiple-testing correction. Nutrition had limited effects on most enteric pathogens, but reduced non-typhoidal S. enterica at 14 months (-6.4%, 95% CI: -9.8% to -3.0%). Interpretation: Multiplex serology provided evidence that WASH may modestly reduce cumulative exposure to selected enteric pathogens, but household-level interventions were insufficient to substantially disrupt transmission in this high-exposure setting. Funding: National Institutes of Health (R01AI166671, R01AI106878, R01AI134814). The original WASH Benefits trial was funded by Gates Foundation (OPPGD759).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: