Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Heteroatom doping is an effective strategy for tuning the stability and electronic properties of atomically precise metal nanoclusters; however, the physical origins of dopant site selectivity remain incompletely understood, particularly beyond the superatomic regime. In this work, we present a systematic theoretical investigation of monodoped gold nanoclusters, M@Aux (M = Ag, Pd, Pt, Ir), including clusters within and beyond the superatomic framework. By comparing the relative energetics of central- and edge-substituted isomers across a series of clusters, we reveal the general trends in dopant site preference. Our results show that transition-metal dopants such as Pt, Pd, and Ir consistently favor highly coordinated central positions, whereas Ag doping shows a weaker and less systematic site selectivity. Furthermore, we show that the dopant site selectivity for transition metals arises from a dual origin: a structure-driven contribution associated with the local coordination and bonding environment that operates across all investigated systems, and an electronic contribution that becomes more pronounced for superatomic systems as a result of the symmetry-dictated interaction involving dopant d states and superatomic orbitals. Electronic structure analysis of Pt-doped clusters shows that central substitution promotes stronger mixing between Pt d orbitals and cluster-derived electronic states, whereas edge substitution results in more localized Pt-derived frontier states and higher relative energies. Extension of the analysis to Pd-, Pt-, and Ir-doped clusters reveals a systematic increase in the magnitude of dopant site selectivity following the trend Pd < Pt < Ir. Our findings provide general insights into the factors governing dopant stability in metal nanoclusters and offer guidance for the rational design of heteroatom-doped nanomaterials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yaycıoğlu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: