Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is characterised by progressive β-cell dysfunction and chronic hyperglycaemia. The enzyme Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) is an important therapeutic target which is involved in the degradation of incretin hormones such as Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GIP) and Glucose-dependent insulin tropic polypeptide (GIP). Despite several DPP-4 inhibitors in use, there are rising concerns regarding their cost, adverse effects and long-term safety. Niazimicin A, a type of thiocarbamate glycoside isolated from Moringaoleifera Lam., has demonstrated pharmacological activities; but its interaction with DPP-4 remains unexplored. This molecular docking study investigated the binding potential of Niazimicin A against DPP-4. Methods: Protein data bank was used to retrieve the three-dimensional structure of DPP-4 (PDB ID: 5Y7H) and was prepared for docking. Niazimicin A (PubChem C ID: 10247749) was optimised and converted into PDBQT format. AutoDock Vina was used for molecular docking with a predefined grid box. Protein–ligand interactions were analysed using discovery studio visualizer and docking validation was performed through re-docking of the co-crystallized ligand. Results: Niazimicin A showed stable docking poses ranging from − 2.816 to −0.090 kcal/mol with a best binding energy of −2.816 kcal/mol. The interaction analysis identified hydrogen bonds with GLN714, SER239, PHE713 and THR706 along with carbon-hydrogen and hydrophobic interactions involving TYR238, TYR241 and PRO249. Docking validation confirmed accurate reproduction of the native ligand binding pose. Conclusion: Niazimicin A exhibited favourable non-covalent interactions within the DPP-4 active site, suggesting its potential as a natural lead compound for antidiabetic drug discovery. Further experimental and pharmacokinetic studies are recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
SAHELI DAS (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: