Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Siesta deprivation is a frequent consequence of modern work and lifestyle patterns, but the specific physiological and perceptual consequences of missing a habitual siesta have received little consideration. In particular, the relationships between siesta deprivation, physiological responses and perceived fatigue remain inadequately characterized. To address this gap, fourteen habitual afternoon nappers undertook a four-hour experiment that included two-hour continuous office work. Heart rate (HR), mean skin temperature (MST), core body temperature ( T core ), cortisol and immunoglobulin A (IgA) were measured, and Fatigue Scale-14 was evaluated before and after siesta manipulation stage (SMS). Results showed that during the SMS, siesta deprivation had reduced MST and T core by 0.87°C and 0.13°C, and increased HR by 10.97 BPM (p < 0.05). Normalized IgA and cortisol were decreased by 0.01 and 0.05 under siesta deprivation but was slightly increased due to siesta (p > 0.05). During afternoon work, MST and T core were significantly lowered under siesta deprivation conditions (p < 0.001), whereas mean HR did not differ significantly between conditions. Fatigue was increased by 1.5 after siesta deprivation and showed a ‘rise–fall’ pattern (p > 0.05). Findings indicated that siesta deprivation could alter thermoregulation and HR, and exacerbate fatigue during office work, providing insights into office working practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: