Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The gaps of the Pythagorean Angle Lattice obey an explicit five-mark law, with hard edge 2/π², determinant law 4/(k(k+1)(k+2)), and a non-Markov colour process whose monochromatic runs are arithmetic progressions controlled by square roots of −1. Let U be the group of rational points of the unit circle and 𝒜 = {Arg z : z ∈ U \ {±1, ±i}}. The Pythagorean angle lattice is PAL = {cot(α/D) : α ∈ 𝒜, D ≥ 1}; its angles are the arguments Arg(W²) of primitive Gaussian integers W, and its classical layer is carried by the sources, the primitive W = a + bi with a, b > 0 and odd norm, through the angles θ_W = 2 arg W of the primitive Pythagorean triangles. We determine the statistics of the gaps between the lattice angles of norm at most R². Every gap is governed by a unique primitive vector with both coordinates odd. The five-mark law gives the joint limit law of the length, determinant, endpoint ratio, colour word and fluctuation of a gap as an explicit pushforward of Lebesgue measure; it rests on an equidistribution theorem for modular inverses on parity classes, proved with the Weil–Estermann bound. The normalized gaps have an explicit law with hard edge 2/π² and tail 16/(π⁴ T²), the determinant has the law 4/(k(k+1)(k+2)), and the second moments of the determinant and of the gap length are 4 log R + C_det and 32 log R + C_G with both constants in closed form. Along the sequence of gaps the colours form a stationary process that is not Markov of any finite order, in which L ≥ 3 consecutive sources share a colour with probability 1/(8L − 10); two consecutive determinants exceeding one form one of the pairs (2,2), (2,3), (3,2); and monochromatic runs are arithmetic progressions with length spectrum R/(4|z|) and phases governed by square roots of −1. At finite height the largest and the second largest gaps are determined exactly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chetansing K. Rajput (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: