Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) often generate fluent but visually unsupported content. Existing training-free methods mainly recalibrate output distributions or edit representations without identifying whether the evidence behind the current claim is visual, linguistic, or shared. This limits intervention precision: unsupported language priors may survive, whereas grounded visual information may be weakened. We introduce a dual-counterfactual evidence decomposition and selective editing framework. Paired visual and linguistic counterfactuals act as sample-specific evidence probes, whose hidden-state responses are decomposed into shared, visual-exclusive, and linguistic-exclusive components. A claim-aware gate attenuates unsupported linguistic evidence only for visually verifiable claims, while an evidence-preserving update protects shared and visual-exclusive support. The method is training-free and requires neither parameter updates nor external verification models. Across three LVLM families, it achieves the highest Accuracy and F1 in all nine POPE backbone--split settings. On CHAIR, it obtains the lowest CHAIR_i on all three evaluated backbones, reducing it by 9.1%-14.7% relative to HulluEdit while maintaining comparable BLEU scores. It also achieves the highest aggregate MME-H on all three backbones, the best results on all four HallusionBench metrics, and a score of 29.3 on MM-Vet. At 23.59 tokens per second, the complete pipeline retains 75.5% of greedy-decoding throughput. These results establish evidence attribution before intervention as an effective and practical strategy for faithful LVLM generation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: