Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Contemporary high school curricula, including South Africa’s Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS), remain heavily content- and assessment-driven, leaving limited space for the deliberate cultivation of moral character (Department of Basic Education, 2012; Bourke et al., 2020). While the literature widely asserts the value of ethics education, comparatively few studies evaluate this value through the systematic lens of a single, explicit ethical theory or specify which values are being developed. This study conducts a consequentialist ethical examination of the importance of teaching ethics in schools for developing students’ moral values. Adopting a qualitative desktop/secondary-literature design, a systematic search of JSTOR, Google Scholar, and PubMed (2019–2024) using defined search terms and inclusion/exclusion criteria yielded a purposively selected corpus, which was analyzed thematically with consequentialism as the interpretive lens. Ethics education is found to promote critical thinking, moral reasoning, decision-making, and social-emotional competence, while also introducing risks of value conflict, curricular overload, and assessment difficulty; when weighed against one another, the net utility is judged favorable. The study offers a theoretically grounded, consequentialist justification for integrating ethics education into secondary curricula and provides targeted recommendations for educators, curriculum developers, and policymakers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jele et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: