Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The question, as asked: separate the atoms — there may be a power law within each of them, and that's an environmental issue then, for each sort of atom to figure out. Run properly, with two traps disarmed in advance, the question finds something real — and its address turns out to be a place the register already knows. The traps, named first. Within one element the fractional miss falls as ~1/A automatically (the mass in the denominator grows while the absolute miss stays a few MeV — Paper 78's size illusion), so a fractional-miss law inside a chain is guaranteed arithmetic; this paper fits the absolute miss in MeV. And fitting 109 chains invites fishing, so every chain is fitted, the full distribution is reported, and a 200-round shuffle control prices what chance provides (D11). This record holds one paper on its own and is refreshed every couple of months. The complete deposit, 10.5281/zenodo.21788037, holds every paper with its code and data and is updated first; for the newest version of this paper, go there.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James Norman Ibbotson (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: