Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The distinction between well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours of grade 3 (NET G3) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) guides treatment but remains challenging. We evaluated Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 (EZH2) immunohistochemistry as a supportive marker in 1618 neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) from ten centres, including 1083 NET G1/G2 and pulmonary carcinoids, 56 NET G3, 443 NEC and 36 medullary thyroid carcinomas and pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas, using the H-score with three expression groups (low < 100, intermediate 100–200, high > 200). EZH2 expression was low in 99.2% of NET G1/G2 and carcinoids and in all medullary thyroid carcinomas and pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas. NET G3 were EZH2-low in 67.9%, intermediate in 23.2% and high in 8.9% of cases, whereas large and small cell NEC were high in 52.2%, intermediate in 34.0% and low in 13.8% (p < 0.001). Low EZH2 expression supported NET G3 with a specificity of 86.2% (positive likelihood ratio 4.9), high expression supported NEC with a specificity of 91.1% (positive likelihood ratio 5.8), and intermediate expression was non-discriminatory. In an exploratory subset, EZH2 and p53/RB1 immunohistochemistry provided complementary information. EZH2 expression was associated with overall survival across the cohort but not within NET G3 or NEC. EZH2 is a simple supportive marker for the distinction of NET G3 and NEC: low expression supports NET G3, high expression supports NEC, and intermediate expression should be resolved by morphology and the established markers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ofner et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: