Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study quantifies the effect of Double-Skin Façade (DSF) systems on building energy performance and indoor thermal comfort under temperate-humid, diffuse-radiation climatic conditions, using Trabzon, Turkey, as a case study. A four-stage methodology was applied: (i) climatic characterization using Climate Consultant; (ii) BIM-based geometric modeling in Autodesk Revit 2024; (iii) coupled Revit Insight–EnergyPlus energy simulations; and (iv) comparative performance analysis between a multi-story DSF-equipped office building (S1) and a geometrically identical single-skin reference building (S0). Simulation results show that the DSF configuration reduced annual heating energy consumption by 15–22% and cooling energy consumption by 12–18%, corresponding to an overall annual energy performance improvement of 14–20%, while the proportion of thermally comfortable indoor hours increased by 10–14% relative to S0. These gains originate from the dual seasonal behavior of the façade cavity, which acts as a thermal buffer zone in winter and as a stack-driven natural exhaust channel in summer. Unlike prior DSF studies, which are concentrated in hot-arid or cold climates, this work provides quantitative, climate-specific evidence for temperate-humid, diffuse-radiation regions, offering transferable design criteria for cavity configuration, ventilation strategy, and glazing selection in similar climates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aydın et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: