Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Let E₄(p) be the error term in the fourth moment of L(1,ψ) over the odd characters ψ modulo a prime p; by Walum's identity it is, up to the factor p/π⁴, the error term in the mean square of the Dedekind sums s(h,p). We prove that E₄(p) = Ω±(exp(c log p / log log p)), so that Zhang's upper bound is optimal up to the constant in the exponent, and that the mean of |E₄(p)| over the primes p ≤ X is O((log X)⁴). Reading E₄(p) as a Riemann sum along the shifted grids {(t+ϑ)/p}, we determine on average over p each of its Fourier modes, through the uniform Titchmarsh divisor theorem of Assing, Blomer and Li. This gives the mean of E₄(p) smoothed at the relative scale (log p)^(−C), and we conjecture that without smoothing the mean is −(π²/4) log²p + (π²/2)(ζ′(2)/ζ(2) − γ) log p + 1.7333…, in agreement with the exact values. Through an exact identity, the error term E(q) in the second moment of the cotangent sum c₀(a/q) of Bettin and Conrey is Ω±(q exp(c log q / log log q)), and conjecturally E(q) ≈ −(1/π²) q log²q on average; numerically E(q) < 0 at every prime 101 ≤ q ≤ 2·10⁵. This contradicts a theorem of Maier and Rassias, according to which E(q) ≥ C q log²q for all large primes q. The same methods give the maximal order, the average size and the smoothed means of a mean value of the Hardy–Berndt sums 2s(2h,p) − s(h,p) weighted by Selberg's sieve function, and we record their consequences for the parity-marked pair covariances of a random sieve. This paper collects the new results of doi:10.5281/zenodo.23613561, with complete proofs of the results on the fourth moment and on the cotangent sums.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leonardo Ursino (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: