Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Biofilm formation and quorum sensing (QS) make Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus hard to treat, and many preclinical agents are reported to act against both. Objective: We mapped preclinical antibiofilm and anti-QS agents against these pathogens and graded how directly each study tested QS. Methods: PubMed and Scopus were searched without a date limit (3,349 records). Eligible in vitro and in vivo studies were published from 2022 onward, tested an exogenous agent and named either organism in the title. Full-text data were extracted, each study received a QS evidence tier, and risk of bias was appraised with an adapted checklist (in vitro) or SYRCLE's tool (vertebrate studies); two reviewers verified the extraction. Results: We included 252 studies, led by natural products (115). A QS assay in the target pathogen was present in 140 studies (56%), a surrogate reporter alone in 27 (11%), and 31 (12%) used a vertebrate infection model. In vitro risk of bias was low in 143, moderate in 93 and high in 16. No meta-analysis was done, and title-only organism matching may have missed studies. Conclusion: Direct QS evidence is common for P. aeruginosa but thinner for S. aureus, and animal and cytotoxicity data are sparse.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma'aitah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: