Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Cervical cancer is largely preventable, yet awareness gaps limit prevention in low- and middle-income countries. We assessed knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) toward cervical cancer among women of reproductive age attending a hospital in Kishoreganj, Bangladesh, and their associations with socio-demographic characteristics. Methods: This cross-sectional study (STROBE) was conducted from July 2025 to June 2026 in the Obstetrics and Gynaecology outpatient department of Kishoreganj Sadar Hospital. Women aged 15–49 years (N = 382) were recruited consecutively and interviewed with a pretested questionnaire. Good knowledge (score ≥5/7), positive attitude (≥12/20) and good practice (≥3/4) were defined a priori. Associations used chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests; correlations used Spearman and Pearson coefficients. Results: Although 74.3% had heard of cervical cancer, 19.4% knew that HPV causes it and 34.6% knew of VIA screening; 13.6% (95% CI 10.5–17.4) had good knowledge. Positive attitude was found in 62.2% (237/381) and good practice in 27.5%. Only 35.3% had ever been screened and 8.1% had received an HPV vaccine, while 90.8% were willing to be screened. No socio-demographic factor was associated with knowledge or practice; attitude differed by number of children (p = 0.045), which would not survive multiplicity correction. Good knowledge was associated with positive attitude (75.0% vs 60.2%; p = 0.041). Score correlations were weak (Spearman ρ = 0.10–0.14). Conclusion: Knowledge of cervical cancer causes and prevention was poor, and screening and vaccination uptake were low, despite high willingness to be screened. HPV-focused education and accessible, privacy-sensitive screening are needededucation, counselling and accessible screening services should be strengthened.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: