Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The direction lists asked twice for this and it had been passed over because it needed a simulation: do any of the candidate repairs actually fix the signs of the 514 alpha-decay energies (P34), and does each added coefficient pay its own bill? Both questions are now numbers. [computed — the scoreboard; fenced — every variant stays a labelled candidate] This record holds one paper on its own and is refreshed every couple of months. The complete deposit, 10.5281/zenodo.21788037, holds every paper with its code and data and is updated first; for the newest version of this paper, go there.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James Norman Ibbotson (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: