Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AI agents now take actions in an institution’s name, often without anyone checking each step. Authority can be delegated to software; accountability cannot. Existing frameworks govern models, systems and roles, but none governs the grant of authority itself. This paper proposes the Mandate Model: no agent acts in the institution’s name without a current, written mandate, built on five decisions a board takes once as policy: ownership, authority, evidence, reversal and renewal. It provides an autonomy ladder with a materiality axis, a gap analysis of ten frameworks, a 25-item scorecard with gating items, a 90-day implementation plan, and mappings to QCB, SAMA and CBUAE requirements for regulated institutions in the Gulf.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
RAGHID W. CHARARA (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: