Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Percutaneous calcaneal fixation does not permit direct visualization of the posterior facet. We examined whether computed tomography (CT)-based three-dimensional (3D) virtual planning was associated with less residual posterior-facet displacement than conventional multiplanar CT planning. Methods This retrospective single-center cohort included 85 patients (90 feet) with closed Sanders type II or III fractures treated from March 2020 to February 2025. CT-based 3D virtual planning was used for 42 feet, and conventional multiplanar CT planning was used for 48. Two observers measured posterior-facet step-off and gap on CT obtained 1–3 days after surgery. Patient-clustered generalized estimating equations adjusted for baseline displacement, fracture characteristics, demographic variables, surgical year, and surgeon. Holm correction was applied across the two main imaging outcomes. Results Mean step-off was 1.85 ± 0.32 mm after 3D planning and 2.24 ± 0.37 mm after conventional planning. The adjusted difference was − 0.40 mm (95% CI − 0.53 to − 0.28). Mean gap was 1.75 ± 0.33 mm and 2.37 ± 0.50 mm, respectively, with an adjusted difference of − 0.63 mm (95% CI − 0.78 to − 0.47). Both Holm-adjusted P values were < 0.001. Sensitivity analyses, including restriction to observed propensity-score common support, yielded estimates in the same direction. The intraclass correlation coefficient for a single rating, ICC(2,1), was 0.958 for step-off and 0.974 for gap. Conclusions Among selected complete cases who completed percutaneous fixation, CT-based 3D virtual planning was associated with 0.40-mm less step-off and 0.63-mm less gap than conventional planning. Nonrandom allocation, time-dependent adoption, and post-entry exclusions preclude causal interpretation. The clinical importance of these submillimetre early imaging differences and any long-term functional or safety benefit remain uncertain. Trial registration Not applicable. This was a retrospective observational study in which the investigators did not assign the planning strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: