Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shale oil recovery is constrained by strong capillary forces, restricted matrix transport, and insufficient carbon dioxide (CO2)–oil contact in confined pores. This study evaluates sodium bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate (AOT)-assisted CO2 huff-and-puff for wax-rich Jiyang shale oil under representative reservoir conditions. High-temperature and high-pressure experiments were conducted to characterize phase behavior, fluid properties, CO2 solubility, interfacial tension, minimum miscibility pressure (MMP), hydrocarbon extraction, core-scale recovery, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) transverse relaxation time (T2). Compared with pure CO2, the AOT-assisted CO2 system increased measured CO2 solubility in oil–water systems by 32%–38%, reduced CO2–oil and oil–water interfacial tensions, enhanced light-hydrocarbon extraction, and lowered the MMP from 30.77 to 28.74 MPa. The oil recovery factor increased from 6.24% to 10.71%, whereas CO2 containing ethanol alone achieved 6.86%. NMR T2 analysis indicated greater mobilization of oil in small and strongly confined pores. The novelty of this work lies in integrating evidence from fluid-phase behavior, interfacial properties, compositional analysis, core-scale recovery, and NMR to link system-level changes to pore-scale oil mobilization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: