Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
3D-printed concrete (3DPC) is an innovative production technique that has the potential to reduce material consumption in construction compared to in-situ formwork or prefabricated elements. However, its sustainability is debated because printable concrete has a higher carbon footprint than ordinary concrete. 3DPC also shows faster carbonation - a natural process in which cementitious materials absorb CO 2 from the atmosphere. When the corrosion of steel reinforcement is not a concern - as in most unreinforced 3DPC - fast carbonation can serve as a form of (re)carbonation that partially mitigates the material's footprint and should be included in life-cycle assessments. This study evaluates this potential through a case study on Tor Alva, a 30 m 3D printed tower in the Swiss Alps. By defining the minimum CO 2 uptake of the printable concrete using thermodynamic simulations, the rate of carbonation measurements and dynamic life cycle assessments, it was possible to determine a positive reduction on the carbon footprint of the 3DCP used in the tower of approximately 4.1 tCO 2eq (21%) over a time horizon of 50 years. The findings highlight the need to consider carbonation coefficients when assessing 3DPC's long-term sustainability and provide a completely new perspective on its environmental impact. In this context, print path planning becomes a unique tool for 3D printing to optimized for (re)carbonation, while keeping durability in check.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lima et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: