Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction Admission scores predict college performance, but engagement may alter this association. We tested learning engagement as a protective moderator and examined related indirect associations. Methods: We matched admission records, a May–June 2026 survey, and same-semester grades extracted July 13, 2026 for 491 Chinese vocational college students; the survey-to-extraction interval was 14–45 days. Results Engagement weakened the admission-score–achievement association ( B = −0.263, p < 0.001; standardized interaction = −0.144, 95% bootstrap CI [−0.214, −0.071]; ΔR 2 = 0.021). The high-engagement slope was imprecise ( B = 0.099, p = 0.078), not demonstrated to be zero; 18.1% of students exceeded the Johnson–Neyman threshold. Self-efficacy showed cross-sectional indirect associations with achievement (ab = 0.321, 95% bootstrap CI [0.232, 0.416]) and career adaptability (ab = 0.153, 95% bootstrap CI [0.106, 0.202]) through engagement. Teacher support modestly moderated the engagement–achievement association ( B = 0.348, p = 0.025; ΔR 2 = 0.009). Results remained stable in integrated and course-adjusted analyses. Discussion Engagement was associated with weaker dependence of achievement on admission scores, but the interactions were small and observational. The indirect pathways and teacher-support interaction require independent replication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
范秀珍 et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: