Key result
Catheter perforation for PAIVS yields ~83% biventricular circulation, with ductal stenting reducing early reintervention.
Why the study?
Catheter perforation for PAIVS is an established procedure, but management of the borderline RV remains controversial, and long-term outcomes as well as the role of arterial duct stenting required investigation.
What are the long-term survival and biventricular circulation outcomes following catheter valve perforation (with or without arterial duct stenting) in patients with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum?
Observational (n=39)
No
What are the long-term survival and biventricular circulation outcomes following catheter valve perforation (with or without arterial duct stenting) in patients with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Catheter valve perforation for pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum yields good long-term survival and high rates of biventricular circulation, while concomitant arterial duct stenting significantly reduces early reinterventions and hospital length of stay.
Objectives This study investigated the outcome for all patients undergoing catheter valve perforation for pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum (PAIVS) 21 years after the first procedure at their center. Background Catheter perforation for PAIVS is now an established procedure. However, the management of the borderline right ventricle (RV) is controversial, and there may be a place for novel techniques such as stenting of the arterial duct. Methods There were 37 successful valve perforations (total 39 patients). Median length of follow-up was 9.2 years (range 2.2 to 21.0 years). Seventeen patients had stenting of the arterial duct. The mean (SD) initial z-score for the tricuspid valve was -5.1 (±3.4), and a further 142 sets of measurements were taken to assess the growth of the RV of survivors. Results There were 8 deaths (21%), and no deaths after the first 35 days. There were no late arrhythmias or ischemic events. Twenty-five patients (83% of survivors) have a biventricular circulation. For patients who had stenting of the arterial duct, significant reductions in early reintervention (0 vs. 7 patients, p = 0.009) and hospital stay (17.4 ± 18.1 days vs. 33.8 ± 28.6 days, p = 0.012) occurred, with no increase in mortality or morbidity. There was no catch-up growth of the RV in patients who had a biventricular outcome (z-score increase +0.08/year, p = 0.26). Conclusions Long-term survival is good, and even small RVs may be amenable to this procedure. Multiple interventions may be required to achieve biventricular circulation, but stenting of the arterial duct may reduce hospital stay and repeat procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chubb et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum (PAIVS) (n=39). Catheter valve perforation (with or without stenting of the arterial duct) vs. No arterial duct stenting (for subgroup comparisons) was evaluated on All-cause mortality. Catheter valve perforation for PAIVS resulted in 21% early mortality and 83% biventricular circulation among survivors, while ductal stenting reduced early reintervention (p=0.009) and hospital stay.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: