Key result
Extensive infarct is not associated with worse 90-day functional outcomes after thrombectomy versus large infarct.
Why the study?
Endovascular thrombectomy is established for large infarcts, but it remains cautiously applied in extensive infarcts with an ASPECTS of 0-2 because real-life outcome data are limited.
Does infarct extent (extensive ASPECTS 1-2 vs large ASPECTS 3-5) affect 90-day functional outcome (mRS distribution) and quality of life in patients with anterior-circulation occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy?
Cohort (n=889)
Open-label
Yes
Does infarct extent (extensive ASPECTS 1-2 vs large ASPECTS 3-5) affect 90-day functional outcome (mRS distribution) and quality of life in patients with anterior-circulation occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy?
In selected patients with extensive anterior-circulation stroke (ASPECTS 1-2) undergoing endovascular thrombectomy, acceptable functional outcomes (20.2% achieving mRS 0-3) and home living are attainable, particularly when successful reperfusion is achieved.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Extensive infarcts (ASPECTS 1-2) may not confer significantly worse 90-day mRS than large infarcts after thrombectomy in selected patients; leaves open randomized trials before practice change.
INTRODUCTION: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is established for large infarcts, but remains cautiously applied in extensive infarcts with an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of 0-2. Real-life outcome data remain limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment comparing extensive (ASPECTS 0-2) and large infarcts (ASPECTS 3-5) in patients with anterior-circulation occlusion and EVT. The primary outcome was the ordinal 90-day mRS distribution; secondary outcomes were mRS 0-3, survival, quality of life (3-level European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) and living condition. RESULTS: Of 18,069 screened patients, 889 were analysed (ASPECTS 1-2, n = 89; ASPECTS 3-5, n = 800); none had ASPECTS 0. With ASPECTS 1-2, 20.2% achieved mRS 0-3 and 55.1% died within 90 days. In the model including successful reperfusion, no statistically significant association was detected between infarct group and the 90-day mRS distribution (common odds ratio [cOR] 0.80; 95% CI, 0.53-1.23) or mRS 0-3 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.89; 95% CI, 0.64-1.25), whereas successful reperfusion was associated with both (cOR 3.68; 95% CI, 2.31-5.85 and aOR 4.10; 95% CI, 2.45-6.86). Among survivors, median European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions utility index was 0.445 vs 0.541 (n = 27/324), and 51.5% vs 50.9% lived at home (n = 33/411). DISCUSSION: An extensive infarct carried a challenging prognosis, yet acceptable outcome and non-institutional living remained achievable in a relevant minority. An independent association of infarct group with outcome was not detected. CONCLUSION: An acceptable outcome remained attainable in selected patients with extensive infarction, particularly after successful reperfusion. Lacking a medically managed comparator, these data describe prognosis rather than treatment effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asperger et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute ischaemic stroke with anterior-circulation large-vessel occlusion and baseline ASPECTS 0-5 (n=889). Extensive infarct (ASPECTS 1-2) vs. Large infarct (ASPECTS 3-5) was evaluated on Ordinal 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) distribution (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.53-1.23, p=0.311). Extensive infarct (ASPECTS 1-2) vs large infarct (ASPECTS 3-5) was not significantly associated with worse 90-day ordinal mRS after thrombectomy (cOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.53-1.23, P=0.311).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: