Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The present study aimed to analyze the association between ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and the responses of muscle hypertrophy and maximal dynamic strength after a period of resistance training. For this purpose, ten healthy, untrained adult women underwent 12 weeks of knee extension training, performing 3–6 sets of seven repetitions at 60% of one-repetition maximum (1 RM) with a three-minute rest between sets. At the end of the last set, the RPE (Borg scale: 6-20) was reported. Before and after the training period, the cross-sectional areas (CSA) of the vastus lateralis (VL), vastus intermedius (VI) and rectus femoris muscle (RF) were measured and summed, and maximal dynamic strength was assessed using the 1 RM test. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to verify the relationship between the percentage changes in individual and summed muscles CSA (CSA_summed), as well as 1 RM performance, and the median RPE reported by participants across the training sessions. The results indicated a weak and non-significant relationship between RPE and hypertrophy of VL (p = -0.050; p = 0.892), VI (p = 0.186; p = 0.607), and RF (p = 0.235; p = 0.513), as well as the CSA_summed (p = 0.242; p = 0.501). Likewise, no significant correlation was observed between RPE and maximal strength gains (p = 0.025; p = 0.946). Thus, under the present exploratory conditions, no clear association was detected between RPE and hypertrophy or strength outcomes, suggesting that RPE may not be a reliable predictor of chronic adaptations in untrained women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antunes et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: