Key result
Ring annuloplasty was associated with lower tricuspid regurgitation recurrence compared to suture repair (1.81 vs 4.06 per 100 person-years; IRR 0.45, P=0.003), but not versus band (IRR 0.71, P=0.26).
Why the study?
The degree of tricuspid regurgitation is related to mortality, and while surgery consists mainly of annuloplasty repair, repair durability is a prerequisite for a lasting treatment effect. This study performed a systematic assessment of tricuspid valve repair durability across different surgical techniques.
Does ring or band annuloplasty reduce tricuspid regurgitation recurrence compared to suture annuloplasty in patients undergoing surgical tricuspid valve repair?
Meta-Analysis (n=15,563)
Does ring or band annuloplasty reduce tricuspid regurgitation recurrence compared to suture annuloplasty in patients undergoing surgical tricuspid valve repair?
In surgical tricuspid valve repair, ring annuloplasty provides superior long-term durability with significantly lower tricuspid regurgitation recurrence compared to suture techniques.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ring annuloplasty yields lower tricuspid regurgitation recurrence than suture repair; extends comparative durability data across techniques.
OBJECTIVES: The degree of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is related to mortality. The majority of TR is secondary, and surgery consists mainly of annuloplasty repair (TVr), but repair durability is a prerequisite for a lasting treatment effect. We performed a systematic assessment of TVr durability. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science). Follow-up of TVr techniques and TR recurrence rates were used to estimate incidence rates which were then meta-analyzed using a single-arm meta-analysis model with random-effects. Comparisons between techniques were performed to obtain incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 50 studies met the criteria for inclusion (5 randomized and 45 observational), with 15,563 patients, representing 79,763 patient-years (mean follow-up: 3.9 years). Overall recurrence rate was 2.73 per 100 person-years (95% CI 2.15-3.47). Ring annuloplasty had lowest rates (1.81; 95% CI 1.17-2.79), followed by band (2.58; 95% CI 1.66-4.00) and suture (4.06; 95% CI 2.93-5.64). There was a large difference in treatment effects within and between groups (P for interaction=0.011). Compared to suture, ring annuloplasty was associated with lower TR recurrence (IRR 0.45; P = 0.003), but not versus band (IRR 0.71; P = 0.26). There was no difference between band and suture (IRR 0.63; P = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term durability of TVr techniques is extremely heterogeneous. We identified the use of rigid rings and flexible bands as being associated with lower recurrence rates compared to suture techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caldonazo et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Tricuspid regurgitation (n=15,563). Ring annuloplasty vs. Suture or band annuloplasty was evaluated on Tricuspid regurgitation recurrence rate (per 100 person-years) (IRR 0.45, p=0.003). Ring annuloplasty was associated with lower tricuspid regurgitation recurrence compared to suture repair (1.81 vs 4.06 per 100 person-years; IRR 0.45, P=0.003), but not versus band (IRR 0.71, P=0.26).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: