Key result
Clopidogrel monotherapy linked to lower mortality than ticagrelor or prasugrel after ischemic stroke.
Why the study?
Ticagrelor and prasugrel have shown greater efficacy than clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes, but direct comparisons of these agents as monotherapy for secondary stroke prevention remain limited.
Does clopidogrel monotherapy reduce all-cause mortality and adverse clinical outcomes compared with ticagrelor or prasugrel monotherapy in adults with prior cerebral infarction?
Cohort (n=14,362)
Yes
Does clopidogrel monotherapy reduce all-cause mortality and adverse clinical outcomes compared with ticagrelor or prasugrel monotherapy in adults with prior cerebral infarction?
In a large propensity-matched retrospective cohort of patients with prior ischemic stroke, clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with lower 1-month and 1-year all-cause mortality and fewer bleeding and renal complications compared with ticagrelor and prasugrel.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not alter post-stroke P2Y12 inhibitor choice; leaves open whether RCTs will confirm mortality differences.
BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor and prasugrel have shown greater efficacy than clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes; yet, direct comparisons of these agents as monotherapy for secondary stroke prevention remain limited. METHODS: Adults with a prior cerebral infarction who received clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or prasugrel were identified from the TriNetX Research Network. Two separate 1:1 propensity-score–matched comparisons were conducted: clopidogrel versus ticagrelor (n=6144 per group) and clopidogrel versus prasugrel (n=1037 per group). Clinical outcomes at 1 month and 1 year included all-cause mortality, hemorrhagic stroke, acute kidney injury, blood transfusion, and seizures. RESULTS: At both 1 month and 1 year, clopidogrel was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality versus ticagrelor ( P <0.001) and versus prasugrel ( P =0.021). Prasugrel was associated with higher hemorrhagic stroke rates at 1 year ( P =0.011). Compared with ticagrelor, clopidogrel was linked to lower rates of acute kidney injury ( P =0.001 at 1 month; P =0.011 at 1 year) and blood transfusion ( P <0.001 at both timepoints). Seizure rates did not differ significantly across groups. CONCLUSIONS: In a large, propensity-matched retrospective cohort of adults with prior ischemic stroke on P2Y12 monotherapy, clopidogrel was associated with lower all-cause mortality than both ticagrelor and prasugrel at 1 month and 1 year, along with favorable safety signals for acute kidney injury and transfusion versus ticagrelor and hemorrhagic stroke versus prasugrel. These associations, particularly the consistent mortality finding, should be interpreted with caution given the potential for residual confounding, including unmeasured differences in stroke severity and indication bias. These findings are hypothesis-generating and do not establish a causal benefit or support a preferred agent; prospective, stroke-specific randomized trials are needed to confirm these associations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khalil et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Prior cerebral infarction (ischemic stroke) (n=14,362). Clopidogrel monotherapy vs. Ticagrelor or prasugrel monotherapy was evaluated on All-cause mortality at 1 month and 1 year (p=<0.001 vs ticagrelor; 0.021 vs prasugrel). Clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality at 1 month and 1 year than ticagrelor (P<0.001) and prasugrel (P=0.021) after ischemic stroke.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: