Key result
Sustained essential hypertension is linked to ~4-mm greater aortic arch diastolic diameter versus controls.
Why the study?
The study noninvasively evaluated aortic arch pulsatile diameter and elastic modulus in subjects with sustained essential hypertension compared with normal subjects.
Does sustained essential hypertension increase aortic arch diameter and elastic modulus compared to normal subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=31)
Does sustained essential hypertension increase aortic arch diameter and elastic modulus compared to normal subjects?
This study noninvasively demonstrates that both aortic arch diameter and elastic modulus are significantly increased in patients with sustained uncomplicated essential hypertension, which may influence the development of cardiac hypertrophy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Enables noninvasive aortic arch assessment in hypertension; leaves open whether these measures improve risk stratification or guide therapy.
A noninvasive evaluation of the aortic arch diameter was performed in 16 subjects with sustained essential hypertension and in 15 normal subjects of similar age, gender and body surface area. In all subjects, measurements were obtained of brachial mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure, cardiac mass (judged on echocardiography) and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity together with ultrasound determinations of aortic arch diastolic and systolic diameter (suprasternal window). For each subject, pulsatile change in aortic diameter, strain and aortic arch elastic modulus were calculated. Compared with normal subjects, the hypertensive subjects showed an increase in aortic arch diameter (diastolic diameter 29.6 +/- 1.0 versus 25.4 +/- 1.0 mm, p less than 0.01), in elastic modulus (1.071 +/- 0.131 versus 0.526 +/- 0.045 10(5) N.m-2, p less than 0.001) and pulse wave velocity (11.8 +/- 0.5 versus 8.9 +/- 0.3 m/s, p less than 0.001). In the study group, a positive correlation was observed between diastolic aortic arch diameter and mean arterial pressure (r = 0.54, p less than 0.01) and between elastic modulus and cardiac mass (r = 0.60, p less than 0.01). Elastic modulus and age were positively correlated (r = 0.73, p less than 0.01) in hypertensive but not in normal subjects (r = 0.08, NS). This study is the first to demonstrate noninvasively that both the aortic arch diameter and the elastic modulus are increased in patients with sustained uncomplicated essential hypertension. These findings suggest that the increase in elastic modulus could influence the development of cardiac hypertrophy, and that both age and blood pressure act independently as factors that alter the arterial wall of subjects with sustained essential hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Isnard et al. (1989) conducted a cross-sectional in Sustained uncomplicated essential hypertension (n=31). Sustained essential hypertension vs. Normal subjects of similar age, gender, and body surface area was evaluated on Aortic arch diastolic diameter and elastic modulus (p=<0.01). Sustained essential hypertension was associated with increased aortic arch diastolic diameter (29.6 vs 25.4 mm, p<0.01) and elastic modulus (1.071 vs 0.526 10^5 N.m-2, p<0.001) vs normal subjects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: