Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ethylene was copolymerized with 10-undecene-1-ol, 5-norbornene-2-methanol and 5-(N,N-diisopropylamino)-1-pentene by utilizing Me2Si(Ind)2ZrCl2/MAO, iPr(CpInd)ZrCl2/MAO, iPr(3-Me-CpFlu)-ZrCl2/MAO and the corresponding heterogeneous silica supported catalysts. In the case of the copolymerization with 10-undecene-1-ol and 5-norbornene-2-methanol the rapid catalyst deactivation with the increasing amount of the comonomer in the feed was prevented through a prereaction of the comonomer with triisobutylaluminium (Tiba). Especially with the Tiba-protected 5-norbornene-2-methanol high comonomer contents were achieved. During the copolymerizations with heterogeneous metallocene/MAO/SiO2 catalysts the arising problem of a diffusion retardation exists for the Tiba-protected comonomers. For this reason the ethylene/10-undecene-1-ol copolymerization with the Me2Si(Ind)2ZrCl2/MAO/SiO2 catalyst yields satisfying 10-undecene-1-ol incorporations only at low ethylene concentrations. In comparison to this, the ethylene/5-(N,N-diisopropylamino)-1-pentene copolymerization with the homogeneous or heterogeneous Me2Si(Ind)2-ZrCl2/MAO catalyst yields comparable incorporation rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goretzki et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: