Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Absorption muography infers path-averaged density from the attenuation of atmospheric muons. Transient flux variations driven by weather, solar activity, and geomagnetism bias sequential measurements that rely on a non-simultaneous background. Here we show a real-time dual-telescope normalization in which two identical plastic-scintillator telescopes operate in parallel, one viewing open sky as a reference and one viewing the target. Their count-rate ratio cancels common-mode flux changes and tracks detector drift. A 140-h no-target run yields a stable calibration, and stacked acrylic slabs give an empirical transmission–thickness curve. Applied to blind targets, the dual-telescope workflow recovers the densities of 20-cm aluminum and 10-cm stainless-steel blocks within uncertainties, whereas a single-telescope workflow shows systematic biases of +18.95% and −22.82%. A vertical stack of the two telescopes further improves common-mode rejection, reducing calibration ratio scatter from 7.6% to 3.3%. The method is model-independent, removes systematic density biases in any campaign where a simultaneous flux reference is feasible, and is directly applicable to field deployments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Basiri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: