Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Insect outbreaks can cause severe forest mortality, but whether impacts represent a permanent reduction in carrying capacity or a temporary shift followed by recovery is unclear. Carrying capacity is rarely quantified directly in disturbance studies, which rely on measures such as mortality rates or biomass loss. Aim: We developed a framework to quantify how disturbances affect stand carrying capacity and subsequent recovery, demonstrated using a psyllid outbreak in a Eucalyptus regnans forest in Victoria’s Central Highlands, Australia. Methods: We integrated disturbance effects into a dynamic self-thinning model to test four competing hypotheses about the persistence of disturbance impacts, using 422 plot-level observations from 27 permanent plots over 39 years (1962–2001) and Bayesian hierarchical models. Results: Psyllid outbreaks were associated with a temporary increase in mortality, equivalent to an apparent 47% reduction in the self-thinning boundary at onset when modelled as a shift in carrying capacity. However, model comparison favoured a direct, density-independent mortality mechanism with gradual recovery over a half-life of approximately 20 years (95% CrI: 7–73 years), rather than a true shift in carrying capacity. Outbreak probability increased with stand density, and excess mortality preferentially affected suppressed trees ( k = 0.729, 95% CI: 0.68–0.78), consistent with pre-outbreak mortality patterns ( k = 0.693, 95% CI: 0.66–0.73). Conclusion: Sap-sucking insect outbreaks impose substantial but reversible mortality, more consistent with a direct mechanism than a lasting shift in carrying capacity. Outbreak establishment is density-dependent and mortality follows existing competitive hierarchies, suggesting density management may reduce risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Odewole et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: