Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The potential of various metal oxides as redox carrier materials was investigated for on-demand hydrogen/ammonia production and solid-state storage through solar chemical-looping processes. Metal production involves solar-driven reduction assisted by various bio-sourced reductants, while nitride synthesis requires a similar reduction process supplemented by nitrogen incorporation. The reduced metals act as long-term solid storage media. Steam oxidation of metals (or nitrides) produces pure H 2 (or NH 3 ). A selection of oxide/metal and oxide/nitride pairs was carried out to identify the most promising systems. Suitable metals were screened according to multi-criteria: thermodynamic feasibility/conversion extents at equilibrium, cycle/process efficiencies, energy/exergy demands, specific storage density, and material availability/cost. Mo, W, and V offer high volumetric H 2 storage density despite low abundance and high cost. Al, Si, Mg, Fe, Mn, Cr, and Ti balance favorable storage performance with high availability and affordability, making them adapted for large-scale H 2 storage, while Zn, Sn, Ga, Ge, Ca, Sr, Ta, and Sc are less abundant or show moderate performance, suited mainly for niche uses. Regarding nitrides for NH 3 synthesis, AlN, TaN, ZrN, W 2 N, TiN, and Ge 3 N 4 formation from oxides with C/N 2 was thermodynamically feasible. Furthermore, energy and exergy analysis revealed that Fe(s), Mo(s), Sn(s), W(s) systems show maximum solar-to-fuel efficiencies (40–50% for C, 20–25% for CH 4 reductant), followed by Ga(g), Ge(s), Mn(g), V(g), Zn(g), Ta(s), and B(s). They also require the lowest exergy demand and inversion temperatures. In contrast, Al(g), Ca(g), Cr(g), Mg(g), Si(g), Sr(g), Ti(g), and Sc(s) show lower process efficiencies and higher exergy requirements due to higher temperatures and associated losses. The cycle temperatures could however be decreased in open reactor systems or by tuning the operating conditions to favor metals synthesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abanades et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: