Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Whether Pilates timing influences adaptations remains unclear. This exploratory randomized controlled trial compared morning and evening mat Pilates in healthy women. Twenty-four women (41.8 ± 5.1 years) were randomized to morning (09:00–10:00), evening (19:00–20:00), or control groups (n = 8 each). The 8-week program comprised two supervised weekly sessions. The protocol was registered on OSF (https://osf.io/zur3x/). Sleep quality was primary; flexibility, strength, balance, self-esteem, and SF-36 outcomes were secondary/exploratory. False discovery rate correction was applied. PSQI scores improved over time without between-group differences (p = 0.296, q = 0.377). Leg-back strength showed an exploratory time-of-day-specific adaptation (group × time × time-of-day: F2,21 = 18.12, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.63, 95% CI 0.30–0.75, q < 0.001), with greatest gains at each group’s training hour. Both groups improved Spiegel scores versus controls (p = 0.008, q = 0.022). Several SF-36 domains improved; Y-Balance reach differed between groups, without clear morning-evening differences. Exercise timing influenced strength adaptation exploratorily. For other outcomes, morning-evening differences were not detectable, which does not establish equivalence. Larger trials are required before scheduling recommendations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ncir et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: