Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to screen the crystalline phases in the flux coatings of three commercial shielded metal arc welding (SMAW) electrodes: a general-purpose rutile electrode (E6013), a cast-iron repair electrode (ENi-CI) and an austenitic stainless-steel electrode (E308-16). The aim was to produce a preliminary reference for later evaluation of locally sourced Nigerian raw materials. Coatings were removed by scraping, ground and sieved below 75 μm. Patterns were recorded on a Shimadzu XRD-6000 with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) over 10–80° 2θ at a step size of 0.02°. Phases were identified provisionally by comparing peak positions with reference values. The E6013 coating showed reflections at 24.9°, 26.9° and 29.4°, provisionally matched to kaolinite (002), quartz (101) and calcite (104), plus an unresolved reflection at 31.8°. The strongest reflection of the cast-iron electrode coating, at 48.1°, is consistent with anatase TiO₂ (200). Its intensity relative to the absent anatase (101) reflection may indicate preferred orientation, but this could not be confirmed. The stainless-steel coating gave reflections consistent with γ-austenite (43.7°, 51.1°, 74.7°), together with a tentative reflection at 65.6° near the ferrite (200) position. These metallic reflections may arise wholly or partly from core-wire or metal-powder material in the scraped coating. Kaolinite and quartz reflections at 24.9° and 26.9° appeared in both the E6013 and stainless-steel coatings. The results are qualitative. No Rietveld refinement or phase quantification was performed, and neither local raw materials nor welding performance were tested.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ikalumhe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: