Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Accurate failure analysis in intelligent supercharging stations is critical for operational safety and efficiency. However, traditional methods suffer from poor cross-condition adaptability, limited few-shot learning capability, and insufficient cross-model generalization. This paper proposes a Multi-Agent Failure Analysis Execution System (FAES), which synergistically integrates a Multimodal Workbench, an Intelligence Hub, and a modular agent cluster. The Multimodal Workbench fuses heterogeneous sensor data (voltage, current, temperature, acoustic) through a progressive three-level fusion strategy with cross-modal attention and Dempster-Shafer evidence theory. The Intelligence Hub formulates task allocation as a constrained optimization problem, which is relaxed to a differentiable softmax routing mechanism. This enables real-time, load-aware scheduling. A fine-tuned large language model (Qwen3-Omni) provides domain-adaptive diagnostic reasoning through closed-loop reinforcement learning from human feedback. Extensive experiments on real-world charging station data demonstrate that FAES achieves 83.2% diagnostic accuracy under few-shot cross-dataset transfer-a 15.8 percentage point improvement over training from scratch and reduces average response time by 42.9% (from 4.2 s to 2.4 s) via dynamic multi-agent scheduling. Ablation studies quantify the contribution of each component, while hallucination analysis confirms a low rate of just 0.4%. These results establish FAES as an explainable, generalizable solution for industrial fault diagnosis, filling a critical gap in the application of LLM-based multi-agent collaboration to charging station maintenance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: