Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Imperator torosus is a polymorphic, critical Friesian bolete, originally described from Central Europe, but with a convoluted taxonomic history which caused much uncertainty in delimiting it from similar-looking species. Previous molecular phylogenetic analyses confidently indicated that I. torosus , as presently circumscribed, is a polyphyletic species in need of taxonomic revision. Based on a two-locus (ITS and LSU) phylogeny, pairwise distance and percent nucleotide similarity analyses, as well as morphological and ecological evidence, I. torosus s. str. is defined and Imperator occultus described as a novel species. Besides unravelling the intricate taxonomic history of I. torosus s. l., detailed macro- and micro-morphological descriptions based on well-documented collections are provided for both I. torosus s. str. and I. occultus , accompanied by colour photographs taken in their natural habitats and line drawings of their main microscopic features. A comprehensive and circumstantial discussion upon the reasons why the recent epitypification of B. torosus is deemed untenable is presented. Morphological comparisons with xanthoid phenotypes of Imperator rhodopurpureus ( I. rhodopurpureus f. xanthopurpureus and I. xanthocyaneus ), as well as their taxonomic placement within the genus Imperator are also elucidated and discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gelardi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: