Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Environmental noise monitoring requires reliable tools for acoustic source attribution and automatic screening of complex sound environments. Sound event classification systems may operate as black-box decision modules, but their predictions must remain trustworthy in practical monitoring workflows. Contrastive Language–Audio Pretraining (CLAP) provides general-purpose audio representations with strong zero-shot capabilities, but its direct application to environmental monitoring may lead to unbalanced class-wise performance and limited reliability for rare or critical events. This paper presents an engineering-oriented CLAP-based transfer-learning framework for robust acoustic event classification in environmental monitoring. The contribution is not intended as a new deep-learning architecture, but as a reproducible validation of a transparent workflow for adapting general-purpose audio embeddings to a specific monitoring task. The CLAP audio encoder is used as a frozen feature extractor, while a supervised linear head is trained on DataSEC, comprising 22 environmental sound classes from public repositories and field measurements. The experimental protocol explores multiple segment lengths, optimizers and hyperparameters, adopting a four-way split into training, validation, early stopping and test sets. Model selection combines accuracy with the minimum and standard deviation of class-wise F 0.5 to obtain a conservative classifier that penalizes false positives. The selected configuration, trained on 7-second segments with Adam, increases test accuracy from 73.95% to 90.77%, while the macro-averaged F 0.5 rises from 74.84% to 90.78%. The minimum class-wise F 0.5 increases from 22.13% to 64.36%, and its standard deviation is approximately halved. These results demonstrate robustness across classes and support the proposed framework as a decision-support module for intelligent acoustic monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Artuso et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: