Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We agree with Pouryousefi and Tallant that a participant-stance account of trust requires a clear bearer of reactive attitudes, and that firms do not literally have such attitudes. We argue that this point is compatible with a trust-based right to explanation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: