Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether muscle, nutritional, and videofluoroscopic factors were associated with 6-month oral intake recovery after stroke. DESIGN: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 1,286 adults with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, oropharyngeal dysphagia, baseline Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) scores of 1 to 4, and index videofluoroscopy within 180 days of stroke onset. The primary analysis was restricted to the 1,241 patients alive at 6 months. Successful oral intake recovery was defined as achievement of total oral intake with multiple consistencies (FOIS ≥5) at 180±30 days; death before 6 months was analyzed separately. RESULTS: Among 1,241 six-month survivors, 748 (60.3%) achieved successful oral intake recovery. Lower odds of recovery were associated with low skeletal muscle mass index (adjusted odds ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.90), low grip strength (0.69; 0.51-0.92), Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index less than 98 (0.75; 0.56-1.00), Penetration-Aspiration Scale score of 6 or higher (0.60; 0.43-0.83), moderate or severe vallecular residue (0.65; 0.49-0.85), and moderate or severe pyriform sinus residue (0.57; 0.42-0.77). CONCLUSION: Videofluoroscopic swallowing findings and indirect systemic vulnerability markers provided complementary information regarding 6-month oral intake recovery among stroke survivors after adjustment for stroke severity, cognition, aphasia, lesion characteristics, and major comorbidities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: