Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
So, YLI, Faricier, R, Guluzade, NA, Belfry, GR, Murias, JM, and Keir, DA. The respiratory compensation point predicts 19.2-km cycling performance in trained male cyclists. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2026-This study tested the hypothesis that the step-ramp-step (SRS)-corrected cycling power output (PO) at the respiratory compensation point (RCP) predicts cycling time-trial performance and explored the independent and collective contributions to trial time of 4 physiological variables derived from single or repeated SRS protocols: peak oxygen uptake (V̇o2peak), cycling economy, RCP, and fatigue resistance. Twenty-eight trained male cyclists completed an SRS protocol before and after a 19.2-km virtual time trial (∼30 minutes) on their personal road bikes using a smart trainer. V̇o2peak, cycling economy, and SRS-corrected PO at RCP were derived from the pre-time-trial SRS protocol. Fatigue resistance was quantified as the change in peak ramp PO from pre- to post-time trial. Independent and multilinear regression evaluated the predictive strength of each variable. Relative SRS-corrected RCP (W·kg-1) showed the strongest independent correlation with time-trial completion time (r = -0.61, p < 0.001). Relative V̇o2peak (mL·kg-1·min-1) and cycling economy (%) were also moderately associated with time-trial performance (r = -0.42, p = 0.03; and r = -0.55, p < 0.001, respectively), whereas fatigue resistance was not significantly correlated. In the multilinear regression analysis, SRS-corrected RCP uniquely explained 30.9% of the model's total predictive variance (r = 0.68, p < 0.01) followed by cycling economy (21.3%), ΔPOpeak (2.1%), and absolute V̇o2peak (3.3%). Among trained male cyclists, relative PO at SRS-corrected RCP is a strong and independent predictor of ∼30-minute time-trial performance. The SRS protocol provides a practical, single-session method to assess key physiological determinants of endurance performance, with valuable applications for training prescription and athlete monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
So et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: